Friday , 27 May 2022

Glasgow Prides’ Drag War

A war of words has broken out in Glasgow, after a Pride event announced it is considering banning drag performers on the basis that they may offend some members of the trans community.

Free Pride Glasgow, whose primary aim is to challenge what is sees as a growing commercialisation of Pride, is planning to host a free of charge alternative to Pride Glasgow’s annual celebration.

The group believes that drag entertainers could appear to be mocking or diminishing the experiences of trans or non-binary people who may be struggling with identity issues.

The mainstream media has, predictably, seized on this. The Metro reported that “Pride event bans drag queens performing because ‘they might cause offence'”, while even LGBTI news site Pink News reported, with hysterical capitalisation, that Free Pride “BANS drag queens in case they are offensive”.

The effect has been to diminish the seriousness of the issues Free Pride is trying to address, and to obscure the complex issue behind a smokescreen of outrage and righteous indignation at what is portrayed as an illiberal and unjustified move.

It is very true that drag acts have been a part of Pride for many years, and that many within the LGBTI community feel a sense of attachment and even identity with them; however, there are those who are ambivalent towards them at best, and others still who very genuinely struggle with treating complex issues of gender identity as something of a joke.

Pride Glasgow has intervened in the debate, suggesting that Free Pride’s actions underline a lack of commitment to inclusivity.

A statement issued by Pride Glasgow read: “We can understand the actions behind Free Pride over the banning of Drag Performers but believe this to action to wrong and going against what an inclusive event should be about.

“As an organisation Pride Glasgow had a similar discussion back in 2010 over how Drag could cause discomfort to people however we took the decision that Drag Queens and Kings play an important part in the history of the Pride movement and should be included within the event, so we used our Pride Guide to address these concerns by having a statement from Crosslynx (a Trans support organisation at the time) explaining that not everyone people would see in Drag at Pride would be Trans or represent the trans community.

“Pride Glasgow believes that any community group should be given their place to flourish but that success should not be built on the negativity and ignorance towards other events, groups and like minded people and we are saddened to see that this is the direction that Free Pride has chosen to take.”

Free Pride have explained their position in detail, and have issued a statement themselves pointing to their reasons for the decision.

It says: “The decision was taken by transgender individuals who were uncomfortable with having drag performances at the event. It was felt that it would make some of those who were transgender or questioning their gender uncomfortable.

“It was felt by the group within the Trans/Non Binary Caucus that some drag performance, particularly cis drag, hinges on the social view of gender and making it into a joke, however transgender individuals do not feel as though their gender identity is a joke.

“This can particularly difficult for those who are not out and still present as the gender they were assigned at birth. While it was discussed whether we could have trans drag acts perform, it was agreed that as it would not be appropriate to ask any prospective drag acts whether or not they identified as trans.

“It was therefore decided that having no drag acts perform would be the best option as it would mean no-one would feel pressured to out themselves.”

There is some merit in both positions, and that of Free Pride seems inherently more reasonable than some appear to suggest. It follows the National Union of Students’ decision not to admit cross-dressing men to their events, for similar reasons.

There are clearly questions as to how to implement such a policy, not least as it is hard to see where lines are drawn between what constitutes drag and fancy dress, but the inescapable reality is that the decision is motivated by a desire to challenge exclusion rather than undermine inclusion.

A member of Free Pride told KaleidoScot: “We are basically just trying to stand up for those so often ignored by queer events and spaces and that means keeping them safe.

I’m non-binary. I’m also mixed ethnicity, disabled, autistic and asexual. In the last week we’ve discussed our concerns with having drag at the event as we are attempting to have an accessible safe event.

“For many of the transgender women and non-binary people, cis drag can be extremely triggering and difficult for them. We wanted to still enable transgender and non-binary drag performers to perform but we were worried that forcing them to disclose their identity would put them in danger and on the spot.

“We all acknowledge how important drag is and has been for many transgender people figuring out their gender and those who wish to express themselves. We also know that some cis drag is inoffensive and can totally fine, but we believed that putting the well being of our transgender members was most important.

“Yesterday, we had a meeting in which members of the drag community and representatives from radio attended – they seemed concerned about our not being an ‘inclusive event’, so we explained that we are putting the well being of marginalised groups first.

“We have had valid criticism, but sadly we’ve had a lot of hostility and harassment from as far away as America and Australia.”

Another member said: “We are trying to listen to everyone’s voices and that includes the trans community outside of FP who have contacted us telling us they think it is a bad idea to have a ban.”

Free Pride have advised KaleidoScot they are considering ways of allowing trans or non-binary drag performers to participate, and that statements on this may be issued shortly.

It’s a difficult question to get right, but presenting the issue in simple “inclusivity versus protection from offence” terms, as some in the media have done, is deeply inaccurate.

In any case, Free Pride are not telling Pride Glasgow how to run their event – simply issuing a statement of intention as to what is welcome at theirs.

Quite clearly, the two Prides will in many key respects be totally dissimilar – so why the undignified spat? Each will be appealing to its own audience, and there is surely room in Glasgow for two very distinct expressions of LGBTI identity.

Pointing accusatory fingers and reducing complicated questions of sexual and personal identity to glib simplicities is unhelpful.

Whether or not we agree with Free Pride’s approach, they seem simply to be saying that there’s nothing funny or trivial about transgender or non-binary issues, and that we should all be more understanding of those of us who are uncomfortable or struggling with our identities.

And similarly, whatever we think of Pride Glasgow, we should recognise the sense of purpose and unity it provides to many LGBTI people in Scotland.

That the two Prides don’t see eye-to-eye is understandable, but the acrimony is neither helpful nor inevitable.

Perhaps we should all be seeking to understand, rather than to deride.

About Andrew Page

Andrew Page
Andrew is KaleidoScot's sports editor and photographer. An experienced blogger, Andrew was raised in the Hebrides and currently lives in Renfrewshire. Andrew became an active equality campaigner at the time of the Section 28 debate, and has particular interests in faith issues and promoting LGBTI equality in sport. Andrew was shortlisted for the Icon Award's 2015 Journalist of the Year.

Check Also

Femme Brutal 1-2

SQIFF 2016 – Full Festival Programme Announced!

Scottish Queer International Film Festival 2016 Full programme announced for SQIFF 29th September – 2nd ...



    • This is not dragphobia by miles. Their argument is to avoid triggering those with gender identity issues that may find drag to be offensive or triggering. I don't agree with the decision – drag culture's but I can see where they're coming from. They wanted to give marginalised groups a voice.

    • Oh no, what a bummer about your crock pot! Those things are so heavy, it must have been scary to have it shatter! Your spaghetti looks delish, it’s right up my hu7a&ndb#821s;s alley!

  2. Right no offence to anyone that reads this, but personally I think it's a load of crap, seriousely look at whatbi have just read and have seen, logically if you's are seriously thinking of banning drag queen then why no do it from the very begging that way the transgender people whom think it offencive would have been offended, in my case I am a cross dresser, I personally don't find it offending if drag queen are on stage that's there job, they are drag artist, I just don't understand why now, mean there are places that have drag queen performing all the time you don't see any transgender people complaing about that.

  3. Thank you for this objectively written article on this topic! It's refreshing to see, after the cissexist bullsh…writings other mediums published. *side-eyeing PinkNews*

  4. It's really nice to read a balanced argument on this complicated issue. I'm so sick of seeing people screaming and jumping to the easiest conclusion. I think it is also worth nothing that the ban only applies to hired performers and not attendees, who can wear whatever they want.

  5. Brian

    I have told "Free Pride" that as a disabled working class queer I fear some disabled working class queers might find middle class and/or non disabled and/or non queer people "triggering" and instructed that they be banned from the stage. If they dare even question my demand that just shows that they hate disabled people, working class people and queer people. You know it makes sense (or rather, unless you are a disabled working class queer you are not allowed to wonder whether it makes sense or not!).

    • à¸ài:¹à¸”ว่ž¸²¸Hà! I’ve been following your website for a while now and finally got the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from Kingwood Tx! Just wanted to mention keep up the great job!

    • Honestly, I am IN LOVE with Too Faced’s eyeshadows. They are amazing and I feel they are so underrated, and I have tons of eyeshadow! I must have that palette, I love how it incorporates bronze, teal, and coral!

  6. As a community we do tend to rather shoot ourselves in the foot sometimes, don't we? This all sounds a bit People's Front of Judea / Judean People's Front. I have never been to Glasgow Pride but certainly in London the drags add colour to the event, they have been there since the start (when it was a lot scarier to be "Proud" than it is now) and far from hindering acceptance by the wider public I think they are the friendly face of the event. It is supposed to be a carnival, after all. I don't want it to be turned into a dour march. We have the rest of the year to be as boring as we want.

  7. This is the dumbest shit ever.

  8. So my question would be so how do they classify the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgences?

  9. Drag queens have always been the trailblazers of the gay community, since before their refusal to be oppressed at the Stonewall Inn. It's just disgraceful for any so-called Pride event to attempt to marginalise them. God knows if the gay community waited for most of the current generation of gays to stand up to oppression we'd be waiting a long damned time.

  10. Thank you for this objectively written article on this topic! It's refreshing to see, after the cissexist bullsh…writings other mediums published. *side-eyeing PinkNews*

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>